anova.mitml.result.RdPerforms model comparisons for a series of nested statistical models fitted using with.mitml.list.
An object of class mitml.result as produced by with.mitml.list.
Additional objects of class mitml.result to be compared.
A character string denoting the method used for the model comparison. Can be "D3", "D4" or "D2" (see 'Details'). Default is "D3".
A character string denoting how the ARIV is calculated. Can be "default", "positive", or "robust" (see 'Details').
(optional) A list of imputed data sets (see 'Details').
This function performs likelihood-based comparisons between multiple statistical models fitted with with.mitml.list.
If possible, the models are compared using the \(D_3\) statistic (Meng & Rubin, 1992).
If this method is unavailable, the \(D_4\) or \(D_2\) statistic is used instead (Chan & Meng, 2019; Li, Meng, Raghunathan, & Rubin, 1991).
This function is essentially a wrapper for testModels with the advantage that several models can be compared simultaneously.
For a list of supported models and further options for more specific model comparisons, see testModels.
The ariv argument affects how the average relative increase in variance is calculated (see also testModels).
Note that the \(D_4\) method can fail if the data to which the model was fitted cannot be found.
In such a case, the data argument can be used to specify the list of imputed data sets directly (see also testModels).
A list containing the results of each model comparison.
A print method is used for more readable output.
Meng, X.-L., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Performing likelihood ratio tests with multiply-imputed data sets. Biometrika, 79, 103-111.
Laird, N., Lange, N., & Stram, D. (1987). Maximum likelihood computations with repeated measures: Application of the em algorithm. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 97-105.
Li, K. H., Raghunathan, T. E., & Rubin, D. B. (1991). Large-sample significance levels from multiply imputed data using moment-based statistics and an F reference distribution. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86, 1065-1073.
require(lme4)
#> Loading required package: lme4
#> Loading required package: Matrix
data(studentratings)
fml <- ReadDis + SES ~ ReadAchiev + (1|ID)
imp <- panImpute(studentratings, formula = fml, n.burn = 1000, n.iter = 100, m = 5)
#> Running burn-in phase ...
#> Creating imputed data set ( 1 / 5 ) ...
#> Creating imputed data set ( 2 / 5 ) ...
#> Creating imputed data set ( 3 / 5 ) ...
#> Creating imputed data set ( 4 / 5 ) ...
#> Creating imputed data set ( 5 / 5 ) ...
#> Done!
implist <- mitmlComplete(imp)
# simple comparison (same as testModels)
fit0 <- with(implist, lmer(ReadAchiev ~ (1|ID), REML = FALSE))
fit1 <- with(implist, lmer(ReadAchiev ~ ReadDis + (1|ID), REML = FALSE))
anova(fit1, fit0)
#>
#> Call:
#>
#> anova.mitml.result(object = fit1, fit0)
#>
#> Model comparison calculated from 5 imputed data sets.
#> Combination method: D3
#>
#> Model 1: ReadAchiev ~ ReadDis + (1 | ID)
#> Model 2: ReadAchiev ~ (1 | ID)
#>
#> F.value df1 df2 P(>F) RIV
#> 1 vs 2 37.641 1 34.766 0.000 0.513
#>
#> Models were automatically ordered via 'logLik' (by decreasing complexity).
#>
if (FALSE) { # \dontrun{
# multiple comparisons
fit2 <- with(implist, lmer(ReadAchiev ~ ReadDis + (1 + ReadDis|ID), REML = FALSE))
anova(fit2, fit1, fit0)
} # }